Article Discourse Analysis: Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Article Discourse Analysis Israeli-Palestinian infringeA Critical Discourse Analysis of an condition on the Israeli-Palestinian conflictWith increasing global media synergies, media studies seems to be gaining popularity in academia. One part of this discipline involves the close examination of media texts, be they written, spoken, or symbolic. To analyse texts linguistically, two di handssions be very much considered that of co presentnce, involving semantics or the construction of meaning, and that of cohesion, or syntax. This analysis can be d oneness finished with(predicate) various types of frameworks, including g ropeed theory, narrative semiotics, conversation analysis, and circumstantial talk analysis (CDA).According to Barthes (1994), texts argon always multi-dimensional and their meanings are uncovered differently depending on the reader, context and setting. Particularly in the media, they are interconnected to other texts, by dint of means such as quotations, i ndirect or direct references, photos or historical facts consequently, it could be verbalize that the media produce and reproduce not exactly texts, moreover from these, social meaning, which is then further reinforced by subsequent intertextuality (Ibid). Baudrillard (2000) adds that language itself is not necessarily creatorful what makes it more so is its use by mogulful peoplein todays society, this being epitomised by the globalised media.Critical discourse analysis is overly sometimes referred to as critical linguistics (Wodak and Busch, 2004). Its roots lie in classical rhetoric, sociolinguistics and applied linguistics, and it is often used to illustrate the relationships that power, hierarchy, race and gender have with language (Fairclough, 1995). CDA is especially used today by academics that regard the discursive unit of a text to be one of the nigh basic units of communication. In fact, it is so widely used within scholarly environments that its legitimacy as a tool for examining power imbalances has been called into question by some, such as Billing (Wodak and Busch, 2004). He conducts that because CDA has become so entrenched in academic discourses, it is thus subject to the same rituals and jargon as institutionalized knowledge, thus negating its potential to demystify the functions and intentions of CDA research. While these points are interesting and worthy of further exploration, the scope of this paper pull up stakes not furnish such examination, and furthermore, the assumptions of this paper are that CDA does, in fact, provide useful tools for critical analysis of media texts.Thus, this paper will apply CDA to one bind by Rory McCarthy in the Guardian intelligence activitypaper, dated Wednesday, December 12th, 2007. CDA will be employed to illustrate overt and underlying assumptions and beliefs, as well as the construction of social meaning.Wodak and Busch (2004) claim that all texts can help reproduce and produce unequal rel ationships in power between men and women, racial groups, social classes, ethnicities, and nations. This can be done through with(predicate) the creation of the Other, which involves the textual representation of a group as being perpetrators and agents operating outside the law (Ibid, p. 99). They further claim that after the terrorist attacks of family line 11, anti-Muslim prejudices became more pronounced in the media, which characterizes Muslims in anonymous and criminal terms (Ibid). Additionally, strategies of generalization, blaming the victim, and victim-perpetrator reversal are increasingly prominent (Ibid, p.100).Analysing the text in the Guardian, these strategies do indeed seem to be in positioning. For example, actions attributed to Palestinians in the article often involved negative activities, whereas verbs cogitate to the Israelis were more neutralPalestinian actions firing rockets, accused, complained, fired back, were detained, were reported, appeared to beIsra eli actions mounted an penetration, verbalise, egress tenders forIt is only when the voice of the article shifts from the writer to a direct refer from a Palestinian official that any harsher activities are attributed to the Israelis sabotage, place obstaclesThe first blame of the article is in like manner interestingIsraeli troops in tanks and armoured vehicles mounted an penetration into Gaza yesterday, killing at least sextuplet Palestinians.As many as 30 tanks and vehicles were involved in the operationAlthough the facts in the article evince that the Israeli forces killed several Palestinians, it is authorized to note the syntax of the meter removes direct responsibility from the army and pins it on the incursion. What is more, semantically, Israeli activity is never referred to as an invasion or an attack but is referred to as a mere incursion or operation, or in the title, Israeli tanks project Gaza. The Israelis have neutral troops which are seeking members of Isl amic Jihad a hardline Palestinian militant group or Palestinian fighters. These phrases imply that Palestinians are the only ones operating outside the law.Although it is crystallize from the facts claimd in the article that Israel is the aggressor in this particular case (tanks enter Gaza, killing at least six Palestinian militants) the writer felt it was necessary to include the feeble reaction of the Palestinians to this incursion even though no Israelis were killed or even injured by the Palestinian action Palestinian fighters fired back. This structure implies a fair battle, although it is abundantly clear that Israel is the only party here with fierce military power.The body count is kept low in the piece, which claims at least six Palestinian militants were killed, rather than emphasizing a larger number, such as slightly ten or even half a dozen even though it seems certain that more than six were killed. Importantly, only the deaths of the militants are remarked here it could be quite possible, then, that several hundred civilians were alike killed.Although as many as 30 tanks and vehicles seems a high number, the fact that these machines, and not people, were semantically involved in the invasion diminishes personal, gentlemans gentleman responsibility for the invasion and deaths. The sentence most of the dead appeared to be members of Islamic Jihad only fairly suggests the possibility that innocent civilians were also killed in the attack, and the words appeared to be mean that there was no watertight confirmation that the dead were, in fact, members of Islamic Jihad. Several Palestinians were reported injured is another vague sentence which refuses to offer quantitative data regarding how many were injured, or give information about who, exactly, gave this report, which makes it sound dubious. The primary use of Palestinians is also vague and fails to clearly state the possible injury of innocent civilians.The situatedness of this text his torically and politically supports Barthes claim that social meaning is reinforced through intertextuality. there is no mention or even implication that the Palestinians are, in fact, fighting to free their homeland from an illegal oppressor, and there is also no overt mention of the illegitimacy and illegality of Israels acts for example, by choosing the word settlement in the sentence an Israeli decisionto issue tenders for more than 300 houses in the East Jerusalem settlement of Har Homa allows for a form of Israeli overboldspeak to w assumeewash what is essentially an illegal occupation that has destroyed the natural environment of the Abu Ghneim lumber and stolen more land from the Palestinians (poica.org) . Moreover, there is no mention of how Israel has repeatedly been condemned by the fall in Nations for its illegal settlements such as that in Har Homa (Ibid). In fact, after reading such an article as the one in the Guardian, readers could well be left wondering undecom posed why the Palestinians have been firing rockets or why they have been detained or have become militants, although the article makes Israeli grievances easier to understand by employing the very lexis just mentioned previously (as well as Islamic Jihad, accuse, complain). Thus, victim-perpetrator relationships are skewed by the semantics and syntax used in the article.There is no doubt that Israel is an oppressive power and disturbing presence in the Middle East, in time it is rarely portrayed as such in the media. There could be several reasons for this, but one may reside in Foucaults notion of discourse, which states that discourse is an institutionalized way of thinking about something, or in other words, it defines the limits of what constitutes acceptable speech on a topic. Discourse is thus re upstartd to power, and defining discourses are often taken to be defining of reality itself (Foucault, 1997).Wodak and Busch (2004) state that the dominant discourse on Israel gener ally supports this state, possibly as a kind of backlash after the blatantly anti-Semetic propaganda that was erst so common in Europe before and during the Second World War, but also because power relationships have shifted Israel is a key ally to the most powerful nations in the world, including the United Kingdom and the United States, and as mentioned by Baudrillard (2000), the powerful use language to keep power structures intact.The final sentence of the article illustrates this point wellAlthough Israeli and Palestinian leaders and negotiators have been meeting regularly for months, todays meeting marks the beginning of talks intended eventually to bring the creation of an independent Palestinian state.This paragraph implies that talks to create a Palestinian state are just beginning, and that a Palestinian state could possibly be created for the first time. Both of these assumptions are erroneous. Without delving too deeply in the politics of the Middle East, it is general ly known by most that shortly after Israels inception, talks to bring off Arab/Jewish territory have gone on almost continually.Secondly, in 1919 Palestine was provisionally recognised as an independent nation by the League of Nations in League Covenant Article 22(4) as well as by the 1922 Mandate for Palestine that was awarded to Great Britain. This recognition continues today due to the indoor garden clause found in Article 80(1) of the United Nations Charter (Boyle, ) . Thus, the creation of an independent Palestinian state negates the fact that such a nation has already existed. Incidentally, legally, Israel does not have fixed and permanent borders (except most recently with respect to Egypt) and yet it is generally considered by the media to be a legitimate state (Ibid).What is important to note here is that history is practically being rewritten in the Guardian text. van Djiks (1990) description as to how this is possible is closely connected to Barthes (1994) and Baudril lards (2000) ideas mentioned above. He claims that journalists and media consumers own mental models of the world and thus any text that is dumb contains only the tip of an iceberg of information (Ibid, p.6). The tip is expressed through syntax and semiotics, but the rest is assumed to be supplied by the underlying knowledge of previous texts. For this reason, Van Djik states that the analysis of the implicitis very useful in the study of underlying ideologies (Ibid, p.6).In conclusion, this paper has illustrated how critical discourse analysis can be a useful tool for unearthing implicit meanings in text, through the analysis of syntax, semiotics, and assumptions implicit through intertextuality. Furthermore, it has given examples of how current discourses of power can influence the content of media texts. There is no doubt that after several years of exposure to standard news formats, broadcasters and audiences alike are prone to overlooking the covert messages in news content. F or this reason, a critical perspective is certainly important, and furthermore, if news texts are assumed to be a system of encoding reality, then the agendas of the encoders must be understood before a thorough deconstruction of their messages can be possible.Appendix 1Israel tanks enter Gaza on eve of repose talksRory McCarthy, JerusalemIsraeli troops in tanks and armoured vehicles mounted an incursion into Gaza yesterday, killing at least six Palestinian militants on the eve of a new round of peace talks. As many as 30 tanks and vehicles were involved in the operation in Confederate Gaza, near the Sufa crossing and close to the town of Khan Yunnis. Several Palestinians were reported injured.The Israeli military said it was a routine operation against militants, but Palestinian officials accused Israel of trying to disrupt the peace talks. Israeli and Palestinian negotiators were to meet today at the King David hotel in Jerusalem to start a new process of talks in the wake of th e Middle East conference in Annapolis late last month.Palestinian officials have already complained about an Israeli decision last week to issue tenders for more than 300 houses in the East Jerusalem settlement of Har Homa. The Israeli policy of escalation aims to sabotage and place obstacles before the negotiations even before they start, said Nabil Abu Rdeneh, a spokesman for the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas.Most of the dead appeared to be members of Islamic Jihad, a small but hardline Palestinian militant group which ahs been responsible for firing temporary rockets from Gaza into Israel. Around 60 Palestinians were detained in what was the largest Israeli operation in months. Palestinian fighters fired back and hit one Israeli tank.Although Israeli and Palestinian leaders and negotiators have been meeting regularly for months, todays meeting marks the beginning of talks intended to eventually bring the creation of an independent Palestinian state.ReferencesBarthes, R, ( 1994) Mythologies, Hill and Wang, LondonBaudrillard, J, (2000), Routledge Critical Thinkers, Routledge Publishing, LondonBoyle, F, (2007) Elements of Palestinian Statehood, in The European journal of International Law, Vol.18 No 3Fairclough, N (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis, Longman, Harlow.Foucault, M (1997) The Politics of Truth, Semiotext(e), FranceMcCarthy, R, Israel tanks enter Gaza on eve of peace talks, in the Guardian, December 12, 2007Van Djik, T. A. (1990). Discourse Society, in Van Djik, T. A (ed.), (2007) A New Journal for a New Research Focus, Volume 18 No 2, Sage Publications, LondonWodak, R and Busch, B, (2004) Approaches to Media Studies, in Downing, J, The Sage Handbook of Media Studies, Sage, Londonhttp//www.poica.org/editor/case_studies/view.php?recordID=1207